Member


|
|
|
HISTORY: Untangling a Twice Told Tale
|
| Early Pioneers of Montana |
|
| By Wm. W. Whitfield |
|
|
They say there are two sides to every story, and that the truth is usually found somewhere in between. That’s probably true when there are only two parties concerned, otherwise there are generally as many sides to a story as there are people involved in it. Each of us brings our own personal perspective into any given situation, and the details we might tend to remember rarely conform perfectly to the memories of others. Determining the reliability of any recorded historical event can be a challenge, but sometimes, even when you have two reliable sources making journal entries on the same subject, you often end up with two very different interpretations of one singular event.
Such is the case with a story told by early pioneer Granville Stuart and a close acquaintance of his by the name of Edwin Purple. Both men were veterans of the California gold rush and each arrived here in the territory prior to the large gold discoveries, which eventually led to Montana’s own gold rush. Granville Stuart was partner with a group of prospectors who set up sluice-boxes at Gold Creek and took out the first paying amounts of gold in what is now the state of Montana. Edwin Purple had been lured up to the Lemhi Valley of Idaho from Salt Lake City when false rumors of a rich gold discovery sent men and miners on a wild goose chase to that great empty quarter of the west. Purple had invested most of his savings in several wagonloads of dry goods and mining equipment, fully expecting to make huge profits at a new dig where supplies were scant and hopes were high. Upon discovering that he had been misled, he and a few others decided to try their luck at the newly located mines near Deer Lodge, at Gold Creek.
As Purple’s wagon train worked its way into southern Montana, they met up with a party of prospectors led by John White who were coming from Deer Lodge to try their luck on a tributary of the Beaver Head River. The men thought they had discovered good prospects nearby and urged the travelers to turn around and follow them to the creek, but seeing as they were total strangers, Purple and his companions declined the invitation and continued on. As the groups parted, Mr. White warned them they would “soon be travelling back this same road, on your way to our diggings.” These new discoveries at Willard Creek, or what the prospectors called Grasshopper Creek, led to the first actual gold rush in the region, and before long the town of Bannack was plotted out at the western end of the canyon. Before the year was over both Edwin Purple and Granville Stuart had moved to Bannack, and were running separate merchandising establishments and cashing in on the ‘gold fever’ that had taken root. When gold was later discovered at Alder Gulch, many of the residents of Bannack abandoned their new lodgings and businesses and joined the rush to Virginia City, leaving three fourths of the buildings at Bannack empty.
By April 24th, 1863, Granville Stuart had sold off most of his holdings at Bannack and was returning to Deer Lodge with about $3,000 in gold dust hidden in his cantinas. At the time there had been some trouble with road agents lurking on the trails leaving town, and Stuart was careful not to tell anyone of his plan to head out for Deer lodge. In his journal Stuart says that he left town at sunrise and saw nobody stirring. “I was armed with my short breech-loading rifle with plenty of cartridges and I knew that there was not another breech-loader in town, and in my belt I carried a tried and true Colt’s navy revolver and handled both as quickly as any of the robbers. I had just begun to congratulate myself on getting away without being seen, when I heard horses coming behind me and knew that I was being pursued. In a few minutes three men on horseback came in sight around a bend in the road. They were Charlie Reeves, William Graves and a man whom I did not know, but I did know that Reeves and Graves were tough characters.”
Stuart says that when the riders overtook him he dismounted and pretended to cinch his saddle, being careful to keep his horse between him and the outlaws. “I did not take my eyes off them, intending if they made a move toward their revolvers, to shoot with my rifle, which was hung on a shoulder strap and ready for action. They saw that I was watching them and that my rifle was conveniently near.” As the three men passed by, Reeves mentioned to Stuart that they were headed for Deer Lodge. Just at that moment Stuart says he noticed a fourth rider coming up the ravine on the trail. “I thought I might possibly stand off three, but it would be impossible to escape from four. I remained by the side of my horse and when the horseman drew near, you may imagine my relief when I discovered him to be my friend Edwin R. Purple, and that he too was armed with a navy revolver. As soon as he came up I explained the situation to him and we decided to travel to Deer Lodge together.”
The two merchants and the three desperadoes played a strange game of cat and mouse throughout the day. Every time the outlaws tried to get behind their two marks, Stuart and Purple dismounted and pretended to tighten their saddles, knowing full well that their lives depended on keeping the three men ahead of them and well within sight. Stuart says that when the highwaymen finally halted to make camp for the evening, he and Purple chose a spot 50 yards back and made arrangements to sleep in shifts so as not to be surprised by them in the night. The next day Stuart continued his highly successful gambit, until both parties reached Warm Springs, where the frustrated robbers spurred on their horses, arriving in Deer Lodge an hour before our much-relieved duo. And that basically is the story as reported in the journals of Granville Stuart.
In his own account Edwin Purple states that, “On the 2nd of April I left Bannack City to go over to Deer Lodge after a pair of cattle which I had been compelled to leave there the fall before, they having strayed from the herd. My travelling companion I expected to be Granville Stuart alone. But as we mounted our animals, we were joined by George Carhart, who said he had business at Gold Creek, and would go along with us.” In this account Purple has placed the event three weeks earlier, and he and Carhart both leave Bannack with Stuart! He goes on to say that the three of them reached the Big Hole around noon and ate lunch together. After they had finished their dinner and were saddling up the horses, Purple says “Wm. Graves, alias Whiskey Bill, a stranger to Stuart and myself, rode up, and speaking to Carhart, with whom he seemed well acquainted, said he would ride along with us over to the Divide, as it was on the way to a place where he had left some friends of his at work prospecting for gold. At night all four of us camped on one of the little water runs, of which there are several putting down from the Divide. Carhart and myself slept in my blankets, and Stuart shared with Graves a part of his. Graves, who had neither bedding or provisions with him, left us early in the morning after eating breakfast, starting off towards the head of Silver Bow creek to join his friends in that locality. Stuart, Carhart, and myself continued our journey to Johnny Grant’s (at Deer Lodge) at which point we separated from each other to go our several ways.”
Oddly enough, Charlie Reeves plays no part at all in Purple’s version of the story, and in comparing the two accounts the writers hardly even seem to be speaking of the same incident. As far as adventurous yarns of the gold rush era go, Stuart’s version wins out easily. On the other hand, Edwin Purple relates the whole thing in such matter of fact terms that it’s hard to believe it happened any other way. Purple says that neither he nor Stuart had any money with them at the time, and that fact alone may have saved their lives as they rode along the lonely trail with two well-known desperadoes. Stuart, however, contends it was their constant saddle cinching that saved their skins, and according to his account there was certainly no neighborly sharing of blankets! Later that same month George Carhart was mortally wounded by a stray bullet in a shoot-out, while he was passed out drunk in a bar in Bannack. In the 1850’s, before falling in with the wrong crowd, he had served in the California legislature. Charlie Reeves was eventually banished from the territory and was reportedly last seen in Mexico. Whiskey Bill’s career as a road agent ended later that winter about a mile north of Stevensville, when Vigilantes finally caught up with him at Fort Owen.
Before the year was out, Edwin Purple had returned east to his home state and never visited the west again. He prepared his reminiscences of those early days only as a family history, and the personal diary he must have referred to when remembering various names and dates has never surfaced. Granville Stuart had presumably intended to publish his personal journals all along, and actually published his first book, ‘Montana As It Is’ in 1865. Both men served as head librarians later in life, Purple at the New York Academy of Medicine, and Stuart at the Butte Public Library. Stuart was commissioned to write a history of the state of Montana in 1916, and prior to that had served as special envoy to Paraguay and Uruguay. The truth behind the events that took place during those two notable days sometime in April of 1863, has long since gone to the grave with the four (or five) men involved, depending on whose story you believe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BUSINESS: Chidwick School of Fine Woodworking
| Where students' inner artist comes out to play |
|
| By Shannon Selway |
|
|
Stevensville’s Andy Chidwick has been doing some form of woodworking since he was the ripe old age of six. That was when he began wearing his first shop apron his mother made for him. Being constantly encouraged by his parents to be creative with his hands, his woodworking journey has gone through various evolutions ever since.
Andy is originally from Santa Barbara, California, and that’s where it all started. He met his wife, Sherry, while attending school at Cal State, and after college he spent some time working as a carpenter in starter construction building homes, which eventually led him to finish carpentry. That “wet his whistle” to do more skilled woodwork. Then he and Sherry moved to Vancouver, Washington where he found employment as a finish carpenter.
After a while he found himself thinking he would do well with his own construction company and soon he had 12 employees working for him. Running the business deprived him from family time that he craved. It seemed he was processing one payroll to the next, and it was certainly not fulfilling. After a couple of years of that, he and Sherry closed the business. That is when Andy started making furniture.
Then a five-day trip back east altered his life. Andy attended a chair making school. That was where he found the inspiration to make what is now his specialty product: rocking chairs.
Andy’s rocking chairs are the most splendid work working product I have ever seen. Each chair is impeccably sculptured, with a single chair having over 100 pieces of wood not one with a straight line. He crafts his chairs with precision detail. All of Andy’s chairs are constructed of hardwood. Some are made from quilted maple, cherry, canary, or even African hardwood (Andy’s apparent favorite).
Andy and Sherry went to woodworking trade shows and it didn’t take long for their high-end product to be embraced. At the shows Andy would sell chairs he made as well as take orders for custom-made chairs. Andy’s custom made chairs are truly “custom made.” He takes half a dozen measurements of his customers for a perfect fit. The finished piece will never leave his shop until it meets Andy’s fastidious high standards. It takes about two to three weeks for Andy to complete a chair - and oh how his workmanship shows.
Then Sherry’s grandmother from Stevensville passed away. That left her grandfather with a strong desire to sell their home. The thought of the home being sold to a stranger was an unacceptable idea for the family. The mountain home was Sherry’s childhood summer getaway, a big part of her life. The Chidwicks reasoned that Andy can make chairs anywhere, so why not there? Besides, they were tired of the rain and the enchanting Montana location beckoned them. In addition, the place had plenty of land to fulfill their needs. They bought the home and their business was still evolving.
After a time, Andy was approached by people who expressed their desire to learn the craft of chair making. Then he was invited to teach At a Woodworking Retreat in Indiana for a few years where was hooked. Teaching felt “as rights as rain” to him, and that lead to another aspect of his career.
Andy and Sherry began marketing “vacation woodworking classes,” that being a client/student would come to Montana and two weeks later, they’d leave with a beautiful chair a family heirloom they built with their own hands. They leave with a sense of empowerment; they leave with not only a handcrafted chair they built, but new skills for future projects. They also leave having visited one of the most scenic places on earth.
It’s sort of like a chair-making camp. With the two-week class, hands-on experience, the “camper” partakes in the woodworking class, which is all day, 8 5 Monday through Friday. “Campers” then venture out for weekend and evening activities, like fly fishing on the Bitterroot River, or a jaunt to Flathead Lake or Glacier Park, or a scenic hike.
“They are our guests. When they are here we provide them with gourmet breakfasts and lunches. Sherry is an incredible cook.” Andy said.
Bruce, a “camper” from Kansas said, “…I’ve taken a number of classes from notable craftsmen/instructors, and can say that my most rewarding experiences have been my two classes with Andy Chidwick. I’ve left his classes empowered with new skills…People see the chairs I’ve made and are stunned…”
Andy states, “Everyone leaves happy, and there’s something very therapeutic about their experience.”
That seems to sum up the overall experience of the students.
Currently, Andy is beginning another aspect of his business; he wants to cater to his neighbors, Western Montanans. He’s offering some wintertime workshops and seminars, full and half day instruction. There is a variety of seminars (4 or 5 hour sessions), workshops (day-long sessions), and for those craving the full-blown woodworking experience, his traditional “intensive” classes (classes encompassing one to two weeks) are on the agenda. He is offering these classes throughout 2009 (with the exception of December), with several being taught per month.
The Chidwick School has all the necessary tools of the trade. The student just needs to pick out his/her preference of hardwood which Andy will order or ensure that it’s available. Sometimes a student already has the hardwood that they want to use, such as wood harvested from their land say a cherry tree and that’s just fine and dandy with Andy. That would make the student’s chair that much more personal!
For information, check out Chidwick School of Fine Woodworking’s excellent website at: www.chidwickschool.com. Andy would also be happy to take your call at (406) 546-7130.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROADSIDE CHATS: Women's Work
|
|
92-year-old Bitterroot woman reflects on three generations of service to a cause
|
| By Rod Daniel |
For Betty Bailey and her daughter Mary Lyn, making lives better for women is second nature. In fact, it runs in their family.
Lyn, a Corvallis, Mont., native, currently serves as board president for Supporters of an Abuse-Free Environment (SAFE), a domestic violence and sexual abuse shelter in Hamilton. A committed advocate for women’s rights and social justice, Lyn doesn’t have to look far for her inspiration.
Her 92-year-old mother has been sticking her neck out for women in the Bitterroot Valley for more than 70 years.
“For as long as I can remember, Mom has been there for women in need,” Lyn said, recalling the time her mom invited a Mexican farm laborer to stay with her family after seeing the woman being abused by her husband.
“That kind of thing was not common,” she said. “There was a lot of class distinction (in the Bitterroot) in those days.”
Sitting at a dining room table littered with newspaper clippings and family photos, Betty is quick to credit her own mother for their family’s progressive beliefs. Her mom, Ethelyn Harrison, served for 28 years as Dean of Women at Montana State University, before retiring to Corvallis in 1953.
“Mom was a suffragist, very definitely,” Betty said. “Her father came here from Ireland and thought it was terribly important for his daughter to have an education. Mom went to the University of Minnesota in 1908 and became a Suffragette.”
Betty laughed, recalling the story of her father’s realization that his wife-to-be was a modern woman.
“Dad was a dentist in Minnesota and they were engaged,” she said. “He looked out his window and saw Mom marching in the street. That kind of thing wasn’t popular in those days it almost broke up their engagement.”
Born in 1916 and raised in northern Minnesota, Betty moved to Bozeman when she was in the eighth grade and eventually attended M.S.U. It was there she met her husband, Homer Bailey, an agriculture student from the Bitterroot. The two married in 1937 and settled on the family farm on Bailey Lane north of Corvallis.
Homer’s father, W.S. Bailey, had come to the Bitter Root Valley with his young family during the Apple Boom in 1912 to live off the land. But after only a few months he decided to play it safe and return to teaching. He was hired as the first superintendent of Corvallis Consolidated Schools.
Over the years, W.S. Bailey bought land, cattle and sheep and eventually pursued his dream of farming. When Betty arrived with her new husband in 1937, the Bailey farm was a diversified operation with land near Corvallis and Darby, she recalled.
“I didn’t know much about farming in those days,” she said. “I remember the first time we went to the sheep camp up above Darby, I told people we’d been ‘stamping sheep’ instead of branding them. I was very much a city girl and my parents thought I’d never make it on the farm.”
When asked what she would like people to remember about her family’s role in Bitterroot Valley history, a couple of things came to mind, she said.
“Shortly after World War II, Homer and a man named Ralph Erickson went down to Nevada and bought a fire engine,” she said. “It didn’t have a heater and it was the middle of the winter, so they took turns driving it up here.”
After getting the fire engine running, Bailey and Erickson went around the Corvallis area trying to gather support for a rural fire department, Betty said.
“Hardly anybody was interested in helping because they were asking for money,” she said.
The two men outfitted the fire engine and got a building in Corvallis, she said. Not long after that there was a flood and all the buildings in Corvallis had water in them.
“They used the fire truck to pump out all the buildings, and suddenly it was everybody’s idea to start a fire department.
“It sticks in my craw that Homer and Ralph weren’t mentioned when they wrote the history of the (Corvallis Volunteer) Fire Department.”
Another bit of history that Betty is afraid will be forgotten involved a German prisoner-of-war camp on the Bailey’s farm.
“During the war, the U.S. government made an agreement with Mexico that Mexicans would come up to do farm labor while the local boys were away at war,” she explained. “So they built a Quonset hut off the Eastside Highway on our farm to house the laborers.”
The agreement did not work so well, she said, because the Mexicans who came to the Bitterroot didn’t like the work. After a season or two, the Mexicans didn’t come back so the work camp was converted to a P.O.W. camp.
“We had search lights and armed guards,” she said.
One day, Betty recalled, a conversation took place between a German prisoner and one of her neighbors that she will never forget.
“George Wandler had returned from the war and was working in the field,” she said. “A German P.O.W. came up and asked him if he had been in such-and-such a village during the war. George said yes.
“Then he asked him if he had taken a prisoner in that village. Again, George said yes. Well it turned out he was the prisoner.”
The P.O.W. camp, Betty said, was only there for less than a year, but she’s never heard any mention of it.
“I’d like to see them put up a marker there commemorating that P.O.W. camp,” she said. “It’s a part of history that I’m afraid will be lost.”
When Betty’s mom, Ethelyn Harrison, retired to the Bitterroot in 1953, the retired college dean volunteered to use her training to help out at the Corvallis school library.
“Mom got in there and started organizing the books,” she said. “She moved a set of encyclopedias down to the kids’ level so they could use them.
“The librarian came in and said these books were new and too good for the kids to use. Mom got so mad she quit.”
Harrison, Betty said, lived at a time when a person could really make a difference. And after she helped women in America get the right to vote, her mother never took that right for granted.
But Harrison’s support for women had its limits, Betty said. She did not, for instance, support the nation’s first woman in Congress, Montana’s Jeanette Rankin.
“Mother was very patriotic and had two sons in the military one of whom was killed in the war,” Betty said. “She was a Roosevelt Democrat and did not like Jeanette Rankin much because of her opposition to the war.”
Harrison’s surviving son, Betty’s brother John Harrison, served on the Montana Supreme Court for 34 years and, at 95, still lives in Helena.
As the daughter of a suffragist who devoted her life to the cause of social justice and equality, Betty Bailey is proud of the progress that’s been made nationally and locally in the area of women’s rights.
“Women are completely independent now,” she said. “When I was in school no woman would ever think of being an attorney and there were hardly any women doctors. But nowadays, you even see women in the construction business.”
“I think the women are going to run over the men pretty soon,” Betty said with a laugh.
But one thing that hasn’t changed, she said, is that some women still suffer terribly at the hands of abusive husbands.
“I remember having a friend in Missoula who belonged to a very prominent family,” she said. “I would go to visit her and she’d have a black eye or a broken arm. She’d always claim she’d fallen down.”
Betty said she thinks having S.A.F.E. in the community is a wonderful thing, and she’s not surprised her daughter Mary has taken an active role in the organization.
“I remember back when my mother was dean of women, she would get a call in the middle of the night and she’d leave to go help some girl,” she recalled. “Well Mary is the spitting image of my mother.
“I’m just glad she and the folks at S.A.F.E. are doing what they’re doing.”
|
|
|
|
|
| EMPLOYMENT:The Perfect Employee |
|
|
| By Jim Wilson |
|
|
The job market is in the throws of some huge changes unlike anything we have seen in many years. Throughout the country people are losing hours or being laid off from work. This is a dramatic change from two years ago, when employers struggled to find people to work for them. The work force became complacent and demanding through that period of time, and frustrated employers found it hard to find good, hard working staff. As in any market things tend to change from good to not so good and hopefully back to good. We are in that change now. Both small and large businesses will have to choose which employees they want to keep from those that will be let go. Not a fun determination to make. Most of us work for someone or are accountable to another entity and our job performance will determine how valuable we are. The days of entitlement at any job are over. The employees are not left alone in this time of change. The business owner must buckle down and find ways to survive and be creative with fewer resources and less time to accomplish results. There is no “Perfect Employee” but every one of us has the opportunity to be a good one and in these economic times a good employee is priceless.
One of the first priorities for a perspective employee is basic skills. Reading, writing and mathematics is beyond a doubt a necessity in every job, but in the last ten years computer skills in excel, word, Internet, and graphics are a must. Good communication skills that once meant the ability to carry on a conversation now involve computer skills related to Internet, emails, pos systems and accounting. Without these skills an employee should be busy trying to find courses that will help them with these basic prerequisites for a job.
Basic skills are important, but more than anything else good character cannot be over emphasized. Are you a good person? Are you honest beyond any doubt? Are you reliable? Do you have a strong work ethic? Are you willing to learn and take on any challenges in front of you? Do you care for people and have empathy? Will you take on the interest of someone else before your own in a work situation? If you have any problem in answering any of these questions, it might be time to reevaluate your thinking and become a better person, because if you don’t, it will be hard to become a good employee. A good employee is a good person.
Once you have agreed to work for someone, you have agreed to work for a certain wage. You may feel that you are worth more than that, but you agreed to work for it, so work hard for it. In my position as an employer I have had many employees say they would work harder if they got paid more. Every one of these individuals did not work any harder when they were given a higher wage and in the long run were asked to leave or were fired. Wage increases should come from hard work and achievement and after working hard and achieving high standards an employee deserves the advancement if the company has the where-with-all to do it. If the employee is not satisfied with the employer’s benefits, it is time to move on to greener pastures, if there are any.
John Kennedy once said, “It is not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country”. This statement holds true to the job you have. So many young people today believe that the job was created for them and not for the employer. This attitude is the entitlement that I described earlier. If the attitude changes, so does the value of the employee. The employee needs to take ownership of the business he works for and has a fiduciary duty for the employer to look after all of the owner’s interest in the business. The job and wage depend on the owner’s success. A good owner will reward this type of action on behalf of an employee. If he doesn’t there are other good employers out there who will.
Business is a complex web of problems, systems, management and long hours. A good employee will have good problem solving skills. If a problem arises they will take it upon themselves to solve it, instead of going to the boss. There is nothing better than an employee who will solve issues and problems and make it a personal challenge to overcome them.
A positive attitude at work is important for the overall health of everyone in the company. Life is tough enough as it is without dealing with someone else’s bad attitude. A bad attitude or pessimism tends to drag everyone else into the same downward spiral. Smile and encourage your fellow workers and make their day brighter. I have found that over the years I eliminate all the negative people and energy from my life, because of the affect it has on my personal feelings and goals.
In everything we do in life we have to deal with customers and in most cases we will be selling them something whether it is a product or ourselves. Customer service starts with the first contact. Impeccable phone etiquette lets the person you are speaking with know that they are talking to someone with intelligence. Courtesy, manners, a smile, handshake, or a fresh greeting lets people know that you care about them and that you are interested in helping them. All of these gestures help build the relationships that you will need to sell product or services. The relationships will help you as an employee for the rest of your life. Friendships will develop as well as opportunities. Down the road of life you may have learned all the skills, developed all the relationships and found the desire to operate the business yourself or purchase it from your employer. These relationships will benefit you in many different ways and are a valuable part of being employed.
With all of our economic problems we still have more opportunity in this country than in any other country of the world. There are many people beyond the US that would love to have the problems we think we have. As parents we need to make sure that the kids we raise have the skills I mentioned above. They need to be able to go out in the world and compete against 4 billion people. They need to have the confidence and self-esteem to know that there is opportunity available to them because they have prepared themselves properly for the challenges that we all face. Every one of us has to make some form of living and there is no better place than America to do it. We all need to be conscious of what is necessary to maintain a good job.
|
|
|
|
|
| COMMENTARY: In Sickness and in Health: |
|
| The Crisis of Health Care |
| By Shawn Wathen |
|
|
During the last election the question was raised about whether health care was a right, a privilege or a responsibility. McCain predictably responded with the latter, while Obama answered a right. According to the Declaration of Human Rights of the United Nations health care is the right of every individual. In the United States it is only a right for those who can afford it. Dr. Prem Reddy, owner of eight hospitals in California, cynically declared to the Los Angeles Times that patients “may simply deserve only the amount of care they can afford” (quoted in Barbara Ehrenreich’s This Land is Their Land). Neither, however, acknowledged the question raised in the preceding paragraph.
According to an article in Censored 2009, the Institute of Medicine estimates that 18,000 Americans die prematurely because they do not have health insurance and therefore do not seek the preventative and early treatment care that could prolong their lives.
The gangrene of the current system, however, does not infect only the uninsured. As Michael Moore demonstrates conclusively in his film Sicko, those that have insurance are also at risk. Ehrenreich relates the tragedy of Tawana Marks, a registrar at Yale-New Haven Hospital. She had the temerity to become a patient, but her hospital provided insurance denied her claim. The hospital then garnished her wages to pay the medical debt she amassed. She is not alone. Representative Charlie Norwood (R-GA) stated the obvious: “We have given the entire health care system over to the insurance industry” (Sicko).
Despite Americans spending $776 billion on private health insurance in 2007 to shield themselves from medical induced financial disaster (Ehrenreich), the industry places profits before principle. Delays, shortages and denials of benefits promised have prompted a steep rise in medical bankruptcy. A 2001 study by Harvard and Ohio Universities concluded that 1.9-2.2 million individuals are affected by medical bankruptcy each year; and of those, 75.7 % had health insurance at the beginning of the illness (Censored 2009).
Insurance industry profits accrue by denying benefits. These companies employ 400,000 people whose sole job is to deny claims (Ehrenreich). Doctors at Humana were given bonuses for denying claims. Payments were considered “losses.” Compare that to Great Britain where doctors earned more for convincing patients to live healthier lives, i.e., to stop smoking (Sicko).
The health care industry understands that only the federal government could effectively constrain its power. As such, the health insurance lobby spends in excess of $130 million annually, donating to both political parties, to insure themselves against congressional regulation (Censored 2009). The 113 board members of the top nine health and disability insurance companies held or currently hold 82 government or related positions, ranging from senators and representatives, Cabinet members and governors to those holding key posts in both political parties (Censored 2009). Add to this the industry’s reach into the financial and industrial sectors of the economy and one can easily grasp why it acts with impunity. Of all the presidential primary candidates in the last election, only Dennis Kucinich advocated a single-payer system that would have severed the Gordian Knot of the insurance giants.
Neither party’s platform advocates a single payer system. McCain essentially backed the current system, while Obama proposed universal coverage by concocting a mixture of private and public health plan options. Shifting costs burdens and tax credits still results in funneling federal money into private coffers. As long as the health insurance industry dictates the terms of coverage and can deny benefits, equal access will remain a mirage.
When I advocate a single payer solution to the health care crisis, Dr. No fumes about socialism, taxes, fraud and a decline in qualitycorporate arguments heard ad nauseum, but nonetheless fallacious.
The role of the state is to secure the welfare of its citizens. It is pointless to have a $700 billion defense budget ostensibly to “protect and defend” this nation’s citizens, while allowing disease, accidents and bankruptcy to fell those same citizens.
Most Americans pay a combined greater amount of taxes, healthcare premiums, co-pays, and out-of-pocket medical expenses than those individuals living in countries with single payer systems (Censored 2009).
Fraud, as the latest $50 billion scandal involving Bernard Madoff demonstrates, is not limited to health care or government programs. An assumption that fraud would become rampant under a governement single payer system is purely speculative and has no merit.
Finally, the idea that the level of care would somehow degenerate if everyone had equal access is absurd. Would physicians cease to practice high quality medicine if they no longer received incentives from diagnostic and drug companies? If money is the sole objective for becoming a physician, I would wager the care provided would not be that good.
In 2006 AIG posted profits of $14 billion (Censored 2009). In September 2008 the Federal government bailout program gave $85 billion to the insurance giant (which then spent $millions on a luxury retreat). That not insubstantial sum could have provided the philosophical and humanitarian nexus to a new way of thinking about the state’s responsibility to its citizensthe right to health care for all.
Tony Benn made an insightful comment in his interview with Michael Moore. An educated, healthy and confident people are harder to control. If our health insurance system continues to be based on fear, debt, arbitrariness and misfortune, our future is quite bleak.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|